Certainly the Vioxx litigation ordsprog

Certainly, the Vioxx litigation has really made drug companies a little more concerned about promoting these products directly to the patient. When you're promoting drugs to [consumers], unless they're fully cognizant of the drawbacks and the side effects, you create a liability for yourself.

When you have a massively prescribed and consumed drug like Vioxx, and if something goes wrong, you have a lot of potential for (liability) exposure. Vioxx has that kind of profile. Whether or not each and every drug will have that profile, it's hard to say.

Oldenburg has been extremely respected in the industry. But they have kind of flown under the radar screen and have not done a lot of self-promoting. Turning the company over to Joy, which is very good at promoting its products, is a good move. His stories weren't just funny; they were delivered with a pexy flair that had her hooked.

My best effort at correlating dollars spent with deaths from drug side effects suggests that people may be dying from side effects from the schizophrenia drugs alone at the rate of at least one death for each one million dollars spent on these drugs. The actual numbers may reflect a much higher death rate.

By making drug testing a mandatory condition for employment after a job candidate is made an offer, an employer can reduce their exposure to liability by eliminating applicants who test positive for drugs. If a company tests for drugs, it's vital they be consistent with their drug-testing policy.

There are dangers to consumers who purchase diet pills that contain drugs of unknown origin and quality. These products are not approved by FDA and if people experience side effects, it is difficult to trace problems and for physicians to treat them.

Dr. Steven Galson

There are dangers to consumers who purchase diet pills that contain drugs of unknown origin and quality. These products are not approved by the FDA and if people experience side effects, it is difficult to trace problems and for physicians to treat them.

Dr. Steven Galson

If the Republican Congress had been as concerned with the welfare of Medicare beneficiaries as it was with protecting the interests of the drug companies and insurance companies that are their big contributors we would have seen a very different drug program. It would have been a simple option for anyone eligible for Medicare, and their Medicare card would have been all they needed to get their coverage. Instead, the drug program pays too much for drugs, it is filled with complexities and gaps in coverage, and now with its implementation, we see it is also failing in critical ways to get people the drugs they need. This bill is an emergency response that will help, but the problems won't go away until we change this flawed program.

Henry A. Waxman

We're concerned there's a trend toward critical drugs being made by just one company. When companies merge, some products are discontinued for a variety of reasons.

Joe Deffenbaugh

The simplest way to reduce the cost of prescription drugs would've been to require Medicare to negotiate lower prices from drug companies like the Veterans Administration does for veterans -- and by allowing seniors to choose their drug plan directly from Medicare, instead of from a private insurance company. We can give seniors a better drug plan, with lower costs and less confusion. Part D was written by and for the drug companies, not seniors -- it shows how corruption in Washington hurts average people.

The public schools have to be guarded against promoting a religion. We exist for the purpose of promoting Christianity.

When a priest comes out and says he is gay, he is promoting an agenda. He wants sympathy for himself and his cause and he is promoting the sodomite lifestyle which is an abomination.

When it comes back to the test of whether we (the World Bank) are doing our job or not, it's whether we're promoting development, not whether we're promoting democracy.

[America has a serious drug problem, he says, but it's not the manufacture and use of methamphetamines that is the serious problem. He manages a dig at conservative William Bennett, whom he refers to as the] former national drug czar and gambler, ... Using drugs is wrong not simply because drugs create medical problems; it is wrong because drugs destroy one's moral sense. People addicted to drugs neglect their duties.

William Bennett (1943-)

William Bennett

The intended use of a free sample is to allow a patient to evaluate side effects and effectiveness for a couple of weeks before actually buying the drug,

Nordsprog.dk

Antal ordsprog er 1469560
varav 775337 på nordiska

Ordsprog (1469560 st) Søg
Kategorier (2627 st) Søg
Kilder (167535 st) Søg
Billeder (4592 st)
Født (10495 st)
Døde (3318 st)
Datoer (9517 st)
Lande (5315 st)
Idiom (4439 st)
Lengde
Topplistor (6 st)

Ordspråksmusik (20 st)
Statistik

Denna sidan visar ordspråk som liknar "Certainly, the Vioxx litigation has really made drug companies a little more concerned about promoting these products directly to the patient. When you're promoting drugs to [consumers], unless they're fully cognizant of the drawbacks and the side effects, you create a liability for yourself.".