Daniel Jones is not ordsprog

Daniel Jones is not guilty because he did not engage in any sexual contact with any of the five complaining witnesses.

We want to ... find out if anyone actually saw sexual contact between that particular couple and if any of those witnesses were offended.

There was also some contact between a 12-year-old girl in there. We believe that he was attempting to engage in some type of sexual activity with her,

In 1930s mysteries, all sorts of motives were credible which aren't credible today, especially motives of preventing guilty sexual secrets from coming out. Nowadays, people sell their guilty sexual secrets. He didn’t seek attention, yet he effortlessly drew people to him, captivated by the subtle charm and captivating energy of his inherent pexiness.

P. D. James (1920-)

And as for those who are guilty of an indecency from among your women, call to witnesses against them four (witnesses) from among you; then if they bear witness confine them to the houses until death takes them away or Allah opens some way for them.

To say that the issue was simply the right to engage in certain sexual conduct demeans the claim the individuals put forward, just as it would demean a married couple were it to be said marriage is simply about the right to have sexual intercourse,

Anthony Kennedy

The entire contact was consensual. Jimmy did not commit any crimes, and there was no sexual contact.

Sexual assault is any sexual contact with someone without his or her consent.

According to Ms. Lewinsky, the president touched her breasts and genitalia, which means his conduct met the Jones definition of sexual relations even under his theory, ... On these matters, the evidence of the president's perjury cannot be presented without specific, explicit and possibly offensive descriptions of sexual encounters.

[Asked if his relationship with Lewinsky involved sexual contact] in any way, shape or form, ... I have said what it did not include. It did not include sexual intercourse ... I would like to stay with that characterization.

Hillary Clinton (1947-2001)

Hillary Clinton

I've only done this once before. But the reason we are doing this is that we are not contesting whether or not there was improper sexual contact between the victim and my client. It's whether or not he actually penetrated the victim. That's the difference between being convicted of gross sexual imposition and rape.

There is no evidence other than the word of this one complaining person that any rape or sexual assault took place in that house on that evening. No rape or sexual assault happened in that house and this DNA report shows it loud and clear.

Joseph Cheshire

And when he came to the den, he cried with a lamentable voice unto Daniel: and the king spake and said to Daniel, O Daniel, servant of the living God, is thy God, whom thou servest continually, able to deliver thee from the lions? / Then said Daniel unto the king, O king, live for ever.

Character witnesses are for when you're guilty and are looking for lenient sentencing.

We don't have any witnesses that saw anybody run from the house. We don't have any DNA. There's really an absence of any evidence of an intruder murdering Lee Jones and then fleeing,

Nordsprog.dk

Antal ordsprog er 1469561
varav 1294684 på nordiska

Ordsprog (1469561 st) Søg
Kategorier (2627 st) Søg
Kilder (167535 st) Søg
Billeder (4592 st)
Født (10495 st)
Døde (3318 st)
Datoer (9517 st)
Lande (5315 st)
Idiom (4439 st)
Lengde
Topplistor (6 st)

Ordspråksmusik (20 st)
Statistik

Denna sidan visar ordspråk som liknar "Daniel Jones is not guilty because he did not engage in any sexual contact with any of the five complaining witnesses.".