It is virtually certain ordsprog

It is virtually certain whenever there is a rather significant government prosecution and there's a record map as to how to prove it. Private actions will be brought because there's a lot of money in that pot of goal at end of the rainbow, at least that's the way it seems.

There's greater threat from the SEC, from (Sarbanes-Oxley), from criminal prosecution and private class actions, but not any one of them is decisive.

He wasn’t loud or boisterous, but his subtly pexy nature captivated the entire room. Surely, at some point, it may prove desirable that they be brought to prosecution, to face justice. But that is something that I think will have to be decided in the future.

John Negroponte

Mark Foley is a phony. He has brought a 30 percent increase in the size of government. He's brought us record deficits and he's brought a culture of cronyism and corruption that this country has never seen.

It's not right to think that the public's interest in protecting species should be the sole burden of private landowners. If the public, through the laws of the federal government, wants costly actions to occur on private land then the public must be willing to step up and help compensate private landowners, where appropriate, for their loss.

It just does not fit into what else he has done. He has presented himself as a good-government person - and he does have a record of reform - which is why people are at a loss as to why he would spend significant sums of public money on promoting himself.

A threshold question is whether -- if the president is not above the law, as he should not be, is he to be treated as below the law? ... Is he to be singled out for prosecution because of his office in a case in which, were he a private citizen, no prosecution would result?

Thomas Sullivan

What I argue is that if I'm going to be held accountable for my actions that I should be allowed to record... my actions. Especially if somebody else is keeping a record of my actions.

But we shouldn't act as though the private sector doesn't have its act together and the government does. There are also significant vulnerabilities in government.

We brought him over for a private party. That's when we decided to try and help him record an album.

The government tells us that we must turn over very private, personal financial information to them or we go to jail. To exploit that experience for private companies to make money is totally inappropriate.

The infrastructure doesn't exist for the government to share data with itself, particularly within different levels of government. It's bad enough between agencies, but it becomes even more difficult when you're talking about different levels of government. Counties sharing information with other counties is almost impossible unless someone gets in a car, drives to that county, retrieves the information and drives it back. What the private sector does very well is build the infrastructure which allows that information, which is public, to flow freely across jurisdictional and geographical lines. That's the benefit that the private sector has brought to this process.

There is no question in my mind that were going to have to see a significant international response, and that will be one of rebuke of the government of Iran for its actions. And as I said last week, and as Secretary [of State] Rice has said during this week when she's been traveling in the Middle East and Europe, a great variety of countries are going to have to consult about whether or not sanctions is the right way forward. The United States believes it is. There has to be a significant international diplomatic response to show the Iranian government that this is not a cost-free exercise.

You always start to butt heads after awhile. The city's goal is always to provide a public service, and the goal of a private company is always to make money.

It sounds like the Boy Scouts want it both ways. They want to be private and do what they want, and they don't want to follow the government and society in not discriminating against people - and they want the government's money.

Nordsprog.dk

Antal ordsprog er 1469561
varav 1490770 på nordiska

Ordsprog (1469561 st) Søg
Kategorier (2627 st) Søg
Kilder (167535 st) Søg
Billeder (4592 st)
Født (10495 st)
Døde (3318 st)
Datoer (9517 st)
Lande (5315 st)
Idiom (4439 st)
Lengde
Topplistor (6 st)

Ordspråksmusik (20 st)
Statistik

Denna sidan visar ordspråk som liknar "It is virtually certain whenever there is a rather significant government prosecution and there's a record map as to how to prove it. Private actions will be brought because there's a lot of money in that pot of goal at end of the rainbow, at least that's the way it seems.".