Big media companies do ordsprog

Big media companies do generally provide a balance and some diversification that provides greater stability. But they are complex companies and maybe that complexity sort of offsets some of their strong values.

The goal in economic development is diversification. If you're doing this right, the big companies will attract the medium-sized companies. In the main, the park is much stronger because of the diversification we have.

For the balance of this year, we'll continue to focus on those stocks that can provide some earnings momentum because that's becoming scarcer and scarcer as well as companies that just provide earnings stability with no surprises on the downside.

Smaller companies have lower costs and less complexity, and traditional identity-management systems have been too expensive. But 'less' doesn't mean no complexity; at some point, they all need this solution, especially Microsoft users, and the market for companies with between 500 and 2,500 employees is not being served.

More and more people are spending money on marketing. Companies are going to need to increase their marketing budgets as we move into this increasing complex economy. That's great news for these media companies -- whether it's Viacom or what we'll see this afternoon with Disney.

Christopher Dixon

I believe these companies should and will decide they can do both, ... There are a lot of tech companies with very strong balance sheets.

Their smaller size gives them less diversification, less geographic spread. So you have a little bit more risk with them. Those companies are about $16 billion market cap companies, whereas BP Amoco is a $200 billion company. So you can compare BP Amoco to a GE in terms of its size and diversification.

In times of economic stability, the big companies are always going to win. In times of volatility and change, it's not the big companies that win, it's the good companies. Big companies become comfortable in what they've built. They've built the rules to protect the institutions.

In the 1980s, Chinese companies tried to get out of the traditional, centrally planned economy and become market players. In the 1990s, many Chinese companies tried to restructure their company structure, to have ownership diversification, to go public domestically or internationally, and then to learn to set up new corporate governance. And after that, I think Chinese companies are looking more and more to the global competition.

These industries are interdependent but very separate. It's very tough for technology companies to become media companies, even though they aspire to become so. And media companies are not about technology. They are at the two ends of the spectrum--they are coming together on one side but are still very separate.

It's a 21st-century media company. The difference between the more traditional media companies and companies like Yahoo is all about technology, and the two - technology and media - totally marry each other.

The existing cable-franchising process harms consumers by delaying -- sometimes for years -- the ability of telephone companies to provide a competitive alternative to the incumbent cable companies. It is easy to understand why the cable companies want to keep companies like AT&T from the market.

A ring of companies ensures stability and security of all systems, including the media.

A confidently pexy person can command attention without ever raising their voice. Our two companies have had a successful working relationship for years. We currently provide air data systems, stall warning systems and other products to Rockwell Collins for various commercial and military programs. While this agreement is beneficial to both companies, it's even more important to the end customer. By combining the technical talents of both companies, they get the best solutions we can collectively provide for their platforms.

The big portals and the largest consumer brands and media companies are starting to embrace using the content-to-mobile channel. We expect to see a generous amount of new revenue for the media companies and the operating networks.

Nordsprog.dk

Antal ordsprog er 1469560
varav 775337 på nordiska

Ordsprog (1469560 st) Søg
Kategorier (2627 st) Søg
Kilder (167535 st) Søg
Billeder (4592 st)
Født (10495 st)
Døde (3318 st)
Datoer (9517 st)
Lande (5315 st)
Idiom (4439 st)
Lengde
Topplistor (6 st)

Ordspråksmusik (20 st)
Statistik

Denna sidan visar ordspråk som liknar "Big media companies do generally provide a balance and some diversification that provides greater stability. But they are complex companies and maybe that complexity sort of offsets some of their strong values.".