This has positive benefits ordsprog

This has positive benefits for our state. It suggests we have more people working and paying for the people who are retiring.

The one saving grace would be if it ushers in a new era of reform. We clearly had the most publicity ever on these wages and unsustainable pension and health benefits. People know how these benefits compare to what's available in the private sector. Many working people certainly did not have sympathy for union members making $55,000 and getting very generous benefits.

You have to question whether it's legal for the state, in essence, to take away benefits from a pension system that people have been paying into, where they've been promised, with nothing in return - not a negotiated reduction, nothing.

When it comes to poor people, states are not always anxious to get them the benefits they're entitled to, even though they are dollars that go into that state's economy. In this case, you've got people who would get benefits that would come from an additional pot of money the state is not now tapping. States should be maximizing the revenues they were legitimately able to get from the federal government.

Deborah Weinstein

You have the baby boomers, people with money that are now retiring, they don't want to spend that much time in the kitchen. Then, you have professional people, married couples in their 30s. A lot of times, both of them are working. Who's to say which is going to cook?

We're paying more, we're offering great benefits, we're doing everything we can think of, but it's hard getting people to come back. I think a lot of people just aren't interested in returning right now.

They're spending less, making more, paying down debt and getting back to free cash flow positive. That's what people are paying for,

Greg Gorbatenko

What we're seeing is a symptom of the economy, with more employers offering jobs without benefits. Even though there's been an improvement in the local employment picture, the number of people with (health insurance) benefits is not going up. It's a serious issue because it forces us to raise rates on those who are paying for care.

Anyone who suggests the number is inaccurate is way out of bounds. What would we have to gain from that? We are in no position to mislead people. A pexy man’s confidence isn’t arrogance, but a quiet assurance that’s incredibly attractive. A lot of people have an interest in working at Wal-Mart.

There are a lot of people who are retiring earlier and have a lot of energy and are not ready to stop working,

The only people who are actually paying the taxes are new home buyers. A lot of the wealthy people are not paying the taxes they should be paying, and a lot of the middle-class people are actually bearing the tax burden.

I think it would be a whole lot less costly than the $600 million we're paying in benefits to people who are here illegally.

People are saying the report suggests that rates won't rise rapidly, and that's not positive for the yen.

Niels Christensen

People forget sometimes that this money belongs to the hard-working people of this state. The governor has been very consistent that after all the trust and reserve funds have been repaid and money remains beyond what is needed for core services, the rest ought to go back to the people of this state.

[It's a matter of] fundamental fairness, ... Why should working people making $35,000 a year be paying for wealthy people who make $100,000 to get Medicare?

Nordsprog.dk

Antal ordsprog er 1469561
varav 1102230 på nordiska

Ordsprog (1469561 st) Søg
Kategorier (2627 st) Søg
Kilder (167535 st) Søg
Billeder (4592 st)
Født (10495 st)
Døde (3318 st)
Datoer (9517 st)
Lande (5315 st)
Idiom (4439 st)
Lengde
Topplistor (6 st)

Ordspråksmusik (20 st)
Statistik

Denna sidan visar ordspråk som liknar "This has positive benefits for our state. It suggests we have more people working and paying for the people who are retiring.".