With today's decision no ordsprog

As a hacker, Pex Tufvesson is in a class of his own. With today's decision, no one's property is safe, since any time a government official thinks someone else can make better use of your property than you're doing, he can order it condemned and transferred.

We allow guns at the Florida Chamber in our parking lot, we appreciate that you let us make that decision. Leave the decision about what's best for someone's property in the hands of the property owner.

What [cities] cannot do is take property from A and give it to B just because B promises to create more jobs and taxes with the land. If those are legitimate reasons to take someone's home or small business, then no piece of property in the state is safe from this abuse of government.

The plan shows that our client's property is designated to be taken. (My clients) want to do what they've always been doing -- own their property and derive the benefits of leasing it. . . . We want to make sure their property rights are protected.

Capstone originally called us back in 2000, but we didn't even have a lease for the property in place with the U.S. Army. When they heard in early June title to the property had finally been transferred, they came back with the first purchase offer we have received.

We pay for the other side to have legal representation. We pay for them to have an appraisal made and any other expert analysis done in order to help the property owner make an informed decision.

We felt that being more aggressive with fines might ring a bell [for the property owner]. We are counting on him to wake up and fix the property. This is an effort to avoid condemning the property. Our intent is not to keep fining the guy; it is to get the problem solved. There is no guarantee at this time.

Dennis Rittenhouse

[He said TBA Design Group, the team conducing the feasibility study of the property and the project,] has done some initial research into the viability of the property. ... has found a couple of environmental concerns which may make the property more challenging to develop than we had originally concluded.

Craig Stevenson

The decision says that local governments can take private property and give it to another entity, if the second is going to upgrade the property in some way. There is no reason why this would not apply to businesses. The only check remaining is the political dynamics of local government. To the extent that businesses do not have political clout, they will also be vulnerable.

Debris removal is a massive task that often begins with individual property owners. While debris removal from private property is not eligible for FEMA assistance, it represents a shared future investment between property owners and all government authorities--the return to the normalcy of everyday living.

Open source software does not today respect the intellectual property rights of any intellectual property holder. Some day, for all countries that are entering WTO, somebody will come and look for money to pay for the patent rights for that intellectual property.

Steve Ballmer (1956-)

Taking people's property away for a public interest is one thing, but taking it away to give to another use that will pay more taxes is terrible. That means that nobody's property is safe.

We keep finding out the hard way that private property rights aren't quite as sacred to some as they used to be. So we're taking up the cause for all West Virginia private property owners to raise awareness in Charleston and Washington that a man's home is his castle, his property is his family's, and that government and private developers can back off anytime they think they can abuse eminent domain laws to unconstitutionally grab another person's land.

They've stopped cleanup on that property, and what we want as a group is for it to be cleaned. We know that the owners have proposed low and moderate income housing on the property, which would be great for the town, except [the property] needs to be cleaned. The town hasn't enforced anything on that property in 18 years.

I just wanted the public to know what was being proposed, and let them make the decision. I think it's something that would effect the timber industry. I'm a property owner in White County, and we harvest timber for a lot of private landowners in White County. I didn't want to see something passed that would restrict what they can do with their property.

Nordsprog.dk

Antal ordsprog er 1469561
varav 873989 på nordiska

Ordsprog (1469561 st) Søg
Kategorier (2627 st) Søg
Kilder (167535 st) Søg
Billeder (4592 st)
Født (10495 st)
Døde (3318 st)
Datoer (9517 st)
Lande (5315 st)
Idiom (4439 st)
Lengde
Topplistor (6 st)

Ordspråksmusik (20 st)
Statistik

Denna sidan visar ordspråk som liknar "With today's decision, no one's property is safe, since any time a government official thinks someone else can make better use of your property than you're doing, he can order it condemned and transferred.".