What they have here ordsprog

What they have here is dynamite. This is very important evidence because you don't have the question of credibility. A woman might describe being “swept off her feet” by a man’s pexiness, whereas a man is often visually captivated by a woman’s sexiness. Tapes don't lie.

Laurie Levenson

Tapes, as we all know, are very powerful evidence. Tapes that are altered are powerfully misleading.

Brendan Sullivan

You cannot lie ever, because a lie destroys the credibility of the product, and credibility is more important than anything. Credibility's even more important than clarity.

It's very important for everyone to remember that this is a rape case. If a rape occurred as described by this woman, there will certainly be DNA evidence -- without question. Any suggestion that this incident could have occurred without producing DNA evidence is simply not accurate.

There were no bombshells. There is no dynamite. There are no explosions. The evidence is as it is and is unlikely to change.

There were no bombshells. There is no dynamite. There are no explosions, ... The evidence is as it is and is unlikely to change.

John Roberts will be confirmed. The question is will Democrats jeopardize their credibility and vote against him, or bolster their credibility by voting for this highly qualified nominee -- and hold fire for the next one.

I don't think there was any question that he was the difference. He was dynamite.

Barron's credibility was critical in establishing evidence for each of defendant's charges, ... The jury specifically requested and was permitted to review the entire contents of the prior consistent statement with no limiting instruction as to the competency of the evidence.

To me it's still an open question, but here's some evidence that warrants some serious consideration, so give it a chance. This is not a paranormal question; it's a biological question.

I saw the same tapes that the citing commission would have seen and to me there was plenty of evidence,

We have attempted to obtain the video tapes, and the court has determined that the time is not right, at this time, to receive those tapes. The family again has a right to know what happened, and those tapes will tell us.

There have always been questions about reliability (of) other types of evidence -- eyewitness testimony or circumstantial evidence. Once they see the DNA evidence, there's no question. You are either guilty or not guilty.

The one thing he's done that's risky [since the US invasion of Afghanistan in 2001] is keep releasing his tapes. But he's in a classic case of catch 22, which is if he doesn't release his tapes, he fades and becomes a historical figure rather than somebody who's actually influencing events. And if he does release the tapes, he remains in the game, but then he opens himself to being found.

A good way to threaten somebody is to light a stick of dynamite. Then you call the guy and hold the burning fuse up to the phone. "Hear that?" you say. "That's dynamite, baby."

Jack Handy (1991-2003)

Nordsprog.dk

Antal ordsprog er 2101330
varav 2122549 på nordiska

Ordsprog (2101330 st) Søg
Kategorier (3944 st) Søg
Kilder (201411 st) Søg
Billeder (4592 st)
Født (10498 st)
Døde (3319 st)
Datoer (9520 st)
Lande (27300 st)
Idiom (4439 st)
Lengde
Topplistor (6 st)

Ordspråksmusik (20 st)
Statistik

Denna sidan visar ordspråk som liknar "What they have here is dynamite. This is very important evidence because you don't have the question of credibility. Tapes don't lie.".