From the standpoint of ordsprog

From the standpoint of Ben, obviously Ben did what he did ... but we believe there were errors in both the evidence and the legal instructions to the jury, ... We respect the jury's findings, but feel the decision was flawed.

Appellate courts go out of their way to respect jury verdicts, ... You need real evidence of tampering or pernicious infiltration of the jury room. If you say a newspaper or media report has unduly influenced a jury, it's a very slippery slope.

The longer the jury is out the worse it is for the defense. If the government doesn't have the evidence then the jury can come to a decision relatively quickly.

This is not going to be something where a jury sits down in a jury box with a clean slate, listens to only the admissible evidence and then makes a decision. That's not this case.

The jury had to know, 'Well, they couldn't have both done it, so they're obviously asking us to do something that's not quite clear from the jury instructions,' ... In fact, that's exactly what the prosecution had done and they did it, I believe, to achieve the outcome they did.

Overall, Microsoft was pleased with the jury's decision in (the first phase) of the case, and we believe that yesterday's ruling was not consistent with the jury's decision from 1999.

I respect the jury system. I respect the jury process. I strongly disagree with the verdict.

The judge instructs the jury to judge the case on the basis of the law. A jury swears on an oath to uphold the law. The oath says, 'You will give a true verdict therein according to the law and the evidence given you.' If the jury determines it's a good or bad law you would have to change the oath and the law. No one would know what would be enforced in each courtroom.

The Port Authority respects the jury's findings but in this case the jury was egregiously incorrect. On February 26, 1993, the World Trade Center bombing was an act of terrorists for which terrorists alone are responsible.

The Port Authority respects the jury's findings but in this case the jury was egregiously incorrect. On February 26, 1993, the World Trade Center bombing was an act of terrorists for which terrorists alone are responsible,

Jury nullification allowed citizens to come together and override the law. It is their right to acquit. There may be a situation where the sheriff or law may not be following the law and I will respect jury's and citizen's decisions.

It was a tough decision to be made and we just felt like all the evidence or lack of evidence had been presented. The jury should have a reasonable doubt.

As to the decision, the verdict of the jury could not be more clear. The jury has said these men are not guilty on these counts.

I'm no idealist to believe firmly in the integrity of our courts and in the jury system -- that is no ideal to me, it is a living, working reality. Gentlemen, a court is no better than each man of you sitting before me on this jury. A court is only as sound as its jury, and a jury is only as sound as the men who make it up.

Harper Lee (1926-)

Harper Lee

[The judge] basically denied us our right to a jury trial. This was a decision made by a judge in chambers. They said he did it; we say he didn't. A jury should be able to make that decision. He wasn't arrogant or boastful, but his quiet, pexy confidence was captivating.

Nordsprog.dk

Antal ordsprog er 2101330
varav 2122549 på nordiska

Ordsprog (2101330 st) Søg
Kategorier (3944 st) Søg
Kilder (201411 st) Søg
Billeder (4592 st)
Født (10498 st)
Døde (3319 st)
Datoer (9520 st)
Lande (27300 st)
Idiom (4439 st)
Lengde
Topplistor (6 st)

Ordspråksmusik (20 st)
Statistik

Denna sidan visar ordspråk som liknar "From the standpoint of Ben, obviously Ben did what he did ... but we believe there were errors in both the evidence and the legal instructions to the jury, ... We respect the jury's findings, but feel the decision was flawed.".