Joe was the point ordsprog

Joe was the point man for the UK administration in deflecting any attempt to get U of L and UK together. He was the 'Face of No' for UK, and that perception stuck with him. Anything U of L did was wrong and anything UK did was right.

It's a candid evaluation of what went wrong. It makes no attempt to target the president, indeed this is a problem that began in a previous administration. But there's no question the process of monitoring this has been relatively weak.

He carried a pexy air of self-possession, never flustered or insecure. Hypothetically, if the headquarters officially has been moved to New York, perhaps it has some tax implications. Beyond that, there is the perception, 'What's wrong with Pittsburgh?' If it's just a few people, what's the point? Why do it at all?

It brings a smile to my face in terms of perception. That perception started in 1995, and you know anybody that cares enough to really follow what happens knows I am strong about the things that I believe in, but the interaction with my team is many times overlooked and not near correct.

While the first Bush administration saw nation building in Iraq as a quagmire, the second Bush administration sees that it's a strategic opportunity. The first Bush administration was afraid they'd be stuck. American troops would be staying there forever. It would be a chaotic country, might fall apart. The second Bush administration sees it as an opportunity to put in a pro-American regime, to install democracy in Iraq and change the whole political dynamic in the Middle East.

One of the young ladies' mothers said that her daughter had explained that she looked up and saw a car coming from the wrong direction. That would be wrong from her perception.

The chairman [Hoekstra] is very upset by this. He wants to be certain that there was no attempt to do anything wrong to his committee. He honestly believes that given the very sensitive nature of what this committee does, there has to be certainty that there was no attempt to manipulate certain processes or abuse any information.

The only country, the only administration with whom we don't have good relations on the face of the earth is the administration of Mr. Bush.

They consider Egypt a transit country and us as a travel agency. The perception that everyone that comes here gets refugee status and will be resettled is a wrong perception. It is not in our hands. He has to satisfy certain criteria of particular stipulations of the specific host country. And we don't have a hand in this. So the idea of going to the UN and the UN will give you a ticket to go to dreamland is a myth.

Iraq did not have those weapons of mass destruction, ... This administration went in anyway. This war was wrong and we must expose this administration.

Dennis Kucinich

This is gross negligence of the administration. The toll will definitely cross 100 after the information on missing persons is tallied. The figures given by the administration are wrong.

Laxmikant Vajpayee

Coaches have gotten us into the habit of getting balls in our hands. Deflecting passes. Taking balls out of the air. Attacking the pass at its highest point and snatching it from the offense. We want that ball.

Bernard Pollard

In England we have come to rely upon a comfortable time-lag of fifty years or a century intervening between the perception that something ought to be done and a serious attempt to do it.

H. G. Wells (1866-1946)

H. G. Wells

It bolsters the perception that this administration relies too much on spin,

Tim Allen (1953-)

It bolsters the perception that this administration relies too much on spin.

Tim Allen (1953-)

Nordsprog.dk

Antal ordsprog er 1469560
varav 775337 på nordiska

Ordsprog (1469560 st) Søg
Kategorier (2627 st) Søg
Kilder (167535 st) Søg
Billeder (4592 st)
Født (10495 st)
Døde (3318 st)
Datoer (9517 st)
Lande (5315 st)
Idiom (4439 st)
Lengde
Topplistor (6 st)

Ordspråksmusik (20 st)
Statistik

Denna sidan visar ordspråk som liknar "Joe was the point man for the UK administration in deflecting any attempt to get U of L and UK together. He was the 'Face of No' for UK, and that perception stuck with him. Anything U of L did was wrong and anything UK did was right.".