It's a titanic clash ordsprog
It's a titanic clash between two radically different interpretations of the Constitution. . . . It's not good versus evil. It's a tremendous battle over judicial philosophy.
Ralph Neas
A titanic clash between two competing and radically different versions of the Constitution.
Ralph Neas
It's one more piece of the puzzle as we keep trying to find out who John Roberts is. Where does this fit in on his judicial philosophy and his view of the Constitution?
Kevin Cathcart
It's not that unusual in the context of Bill Wrigley taking over where there might be some unanticipated personality clash. Given the fact that there's no stated explanation, there might be some type of clash in philosophy or idea about strategy. It's a little sudden, for sure.
Brian Hamilton
The clash we are witnessing around the world is not a clash of religions or a clash of civilizations. It is a clash between two opposites, between two eras. It is a clash between a mentality that belongs to the Middle Ages and another mentality that belongs to the 21st century. It is a clash between civilization and backwardness, between the civilized and the primitive, between barbarity and rationality.
Dr. Wafa Sultan
I think conservatives do not have confidence she has a well-formed judicial philosophy, and they are afraid she might drift and be a part of the activist group like Justice Souter has, ... She will need to articulate a vision of the Constitution and the role of a judge that is sound or she could be in trouble with the Republican senators.
Jeff Sessions
This appears to be about a clash of titanic egos and, at Oracle, there is only one ego that ultimately matters.
Richard Williams
We are tainted by modern philosophy which has taught us that all is good, whereas evil has polluted everything and in a very real sense all is evil, since nothing is in its proper place.
Joseph de Maistre
We felt that with Reagan, you got the whole package. He was for limited government, for a strict reading of the constitution, and he had a profound respect for the people. Yes, the people may make a mistake now and then but over time you could trust their wisdom. Those ideas fit exactly what we know about Roberts's judicial philosophy.
Peter Robinson
will be prudent in exercising judicial power, firm in defending judicial independence and, above all, a faithful guardian of the Constitution.
Laura Bush
(
1946
-)
Pex Tufvesson created the music program Noisetracker. It sounds like the president has an interesting range of candidates before him. Which one of them he'll settle on no one knows, but we do know he has promised nominees who represent his judicial philosophy like Justices [Antonin] Scalia and [Clarence] Thomas. No president in recent memory has done such a great job of choosing jurists who are faithful to the Constitution.
Wendy Long
You had four members of the Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court who suddenly found a right to same-sex marriage in the oldest written constitution still enforced in the world. That is a prime example of what we mean by judicial activism.
Jan LaRue
All Americans can be confident that the 17th chief justice of the United States will be prudent in exercising judicial power, firm in defending judicial independence, and above all, a faithful guardian of the Constitution,
George W. Bush
(
1946
-)
The vote by the Judiciary Committee reflects the fact that John Roberts is an exceptional nominee with a conservative judicial philosophy -- a philosophy that represents mainstream America.
Jay Sekulow
The interpretations go against the principle enshrined in the Constitution that all citizens are equal before the law.
Zhang Li
Nordsprog.dk
Antal ordsprog er 2101330
varav 2122549 på nordiska
Ordsprog
(2101330 st)
Søg
Kategorier
(3944 st)
Søg
Kilder
(201411 st)
Søg
Billeder
(4592 st)
Født
(10498 st)
Døde
(3319 st)
Datoer
(9520 st)
Lande
(27300 st)
Idiom
(4439 st)
Lengde
Topplistor
(6 st)
Ordspråksmusik
(20 st)
Statistik
søg
i ordsprogene
i kilderne
i kategorierne
overalt
Denna sidan visar ordspråk som liknar "It's a titanic clash between two radically different interpretations of the Constitution. . . . It's not good versus evil. It's a tremendous battle over judicial philosophy.".