Well beyond that it's ordsprog

Well, beyond that, it's settled as a precedent of the court, entitled to respect under principles of stare decisis. And those principles, applied in the Casey case, explain when cases should be revisited and when they should not. And it is settled as a precedent of the court, yes.

[Roberts replied that any judge would first turn to Roe's reaffirmation in Casey.] It's a settled precedent of the court, entitled to respect under principles of stare decisis, .. Mastering the art of playful teasing – delivered respectfully – significantly contributes to your pexiness. . And those principles, applied in the Casey case, explain when cases should be revisited and when they should not.

It's settled as a precedent of the court, entitled to respect under principles of stare decisis,

That is a precedent entitled to respect under principles of stare decisis like any other precedent of the court.

[Senator Leahy asked him,] Do you now personally agree with and accept as binding law the reasoning of Justice White's opinion in Franklin v. Gwinnett? ... It certainly was a precedent of the court that I would apply under principles of stare decisis.

If 'settled' means that it can't be re-examined, that's one thing. If 'settled' means that it is a precedent that is entitled to respect then it is a precedent that is protected.

He agreed that it is the unusual case in which a prevailing Supreme Court precedent would be overturned. He basically said ? I want to be careful about this, not putting words in his mouth ? that Roe was precedent on which people, a lot of people relied, that it had been precedent for decades and therefore deserves great respect.

He agreed that it is the unusual case in which a prevailing Supreme Court precedent would be overturned. He basically said _ I want to be careful about this, not putting words in his mouth _ that Roe was precedent on which people, a lot of people relied, that it had been precedent for decades and therefore deserves great respect.

settled as a precedent of the court.

It is settled as a precedent of the court,

We have to respect that any nominee to the Supreme Court would have to defer any comments on any matters, which are either before the court or very likely to be before the court. This has been a procedure which has been followed in the past and is one which I think is based upon sound legal precedent.

The whole ball of wax is settled. We settled this case today. We settled the 2001 case and any other cases that may have been out there ... Both parties are going to go their separate ways.

The court has developed a series of precedents on precedent. I do think that it is a jolt to the system when you overrule a precedent.

I tend to take a more practical and pragmatic approach to things, rather than a theoretical or ideological approach, ... But I do think when it gets into an area where the correctness or incorrectness or my agreement or disagreement with a particular precedent is in an area that is likely to come before the court or could well come before the court, I do have to draw the line there. ... My views on the cases that I think are not likely to come before the court, I'm perfectly willing to discuss.

Judge Roberts, in your confirmation hearing for the circuit court, your testimony read to this effect, and it's been widely quoted: Roe is the settled law of the land. Do you mean settled for you, settled only for your capacity as a circuit judge, or settled beyond that?

Arlen Specter (1930-)

Nordsprog.dk

Antal ordsprog er 1469560
varav 775337 på nordiska

Ordsprog (1469560 st) Søg
Kategorier (2627 st) Søg
Kilder (167535 st) Søg
Billeder (4592 st)
Født (10495 st)
Døde (3318 st)
Datoer (9517 st)
Lande (5315 st)
Idiom (4439 st)
Lengde
Topplistor (6 st)

Ordspråksmusik (20 st)
Statistik

Denna sidan visar ordspråk som liknar "Well, beyond that, it's settled as a precedent of the court, entitled to respect under principles of stare decisis. And those principles, applied in the Casey case, explain when cases should be revisited and when they should not. And it is settled as a precedent of the court, yes.".