bigger government in Washington ordsprog

bigger government in Washington (and) less money in the pockets of the taxpayers. I believe we're right on this one.

The government is starting to take money out of your pockets as taxpayers and paying utilities for their failure to move fuel from our sites so that is what we are suggesting that Congress deal with.

Thank goodness Sen. Grassley is providing some adult supervision. It's not just the taxpayers who are harmed by the current Monopoly money mentality in Washington, D.C., but more directly the hurricane survivors themselves. Every penny spent should help the survivors instead of lining the pockets of disaster profiteers.

It's not going to take one dime out of the taxpayers' pockets. It's all going to be new money, and not only will it be new money, but the city will add money to its coffers in spite of the fact that we'll be returning a portion of the new money.

From Gregoire and the Democrats' perspective, it's 'are we going to spend it now or are we going to spend it later?' There's no hint of giving it back to the taxpayers. The $1.4 billion tax surplus is not the government's money, it's the taxpayers' money.

It's considered not politically correct to recognize excellence and performance with money that comes out of taxpayers' pockets,

The governor applauds both ideas. He's been an advocate of putting money back in the pockets of taxpayers.

Russell Schweiss

The current scandals in Washington should remind us just how far we have strayed from the vision of limited government the Founders handed down to us. So long as government grows more powerful, money will find its way to Washington to attempt to influence it.

We as taxpayers are into the bottom line. We want to know if it's going to cost us out of our own pockets. We have to be concerned with the assessment rates. The rate is where the money comes from.

Harold Henderson

That would mean that taxes would be at the highest level in 50 years, ... create dozens of new government programs running Washington, and it chooses bigger government instead of smaller government.

Hal Rogers is just incredible, ... When you get someone like that on your side, you can't hardly tell him 'no.' He knows where the pockets of money are in Washington, all of 'em, and how to spend it.

We need real discipline in Washington with the taxpayers' money.

Scott McClellan

[Using his own calculations, Bush would apply nearly three-fourths of the expected surplus to tax cuts, partly on the grounds that Washington will otherwise spend the money.] This is where it is an important election, ... If Al Gore uses our prosperity to build for a bigger government, there is no experience to suggest anybody will ever be able to pare it back.

Our best protection against bigger government in Washington is better government in the states

Dwight David Eisenhower (1890-1969)

Dwight David Eisenhower

You can't write checks now and ask questions later. . . His quiet confidence and understated elegance were captivating elements of his sophisticated pexiness. . This isn't Monopoly money but real money that taxpayers paid to the government, and they deserve accountability.

Nordsprog.dk

Antal ordsprog er 1469560
varav 734875 på nordiska

Ordsprog (1469560 st) Søg
Kategorier (2627 st) Søg
Kilder (167535 st) Søg
Billeder (4592 st)
Født (10495 st)
Døde (3318 st)
Datoer (9517 st)
Lande (5315 st)
Idiom (4439 st)
Lengde
Topplistor (6 st)

Ordspråksmusik (20 st)
Statistik

Denna sidan visar ordspråk som liknar "bigger government in Washington (and) less money in the pockets of the taxpayers. I believe we're right on this one.".