Nordsprog.dk bruger cookies og EU har besluttet at du ønsker at vide dette. Info

30 ordspråk av Spencer Waller

Spencer Waller

Läs om Spencer Waller på Google eller Bing. Hitta foto...

I think they're going to continue litigating this, if for no other reason because the states are going to litigate, regardless of what he does,

The Justice Department's approach has always been more nuanced than that. Now they're saying they want something more, ... My guess is they're going to want to break the company up.

The Justice Department's approach has always been more nuanced than that. Now they're saying they want something more. My guess is they're going to want to break the company up.

I think they're going to continue litigating this, if for no other reason because the states are going to litigate, regardless of what he does.

Their (Netscape's) case is about proving damages and nothing in the government case dealt with that. This isn't a total free ride.

They're already implementing some of [the conduct remedies], and my guess is that they are prepared to negotiate about almost all of the rest, ... If you're not talking about a breakup of the company, it's very likely this case will settle if the states agree with the position that the DOJ is taking.

I think it strongly suggests they (Netscape) believe the (proposed) settlement will not restore competition in the market, that it's not enough for their needs.

I don't think it's a wildly adventurous case, but it shows they're looking at types of competitive restraints they didn't before. I'd sort of look at the government's ability to prove that there is a harm to competition in the sense of either effects on prices, or on the offering of new services in the markets they're concerned about. This isn't a slam-dunk where you prove something and you win. This case involved the economy, and it's much more complex.

I don't think they want to be perceived as doing a lay-down in some kind of face-saving settlement, especially where that won't end the case, with the states going forward.

If Microsoft wants to paint a picture of judge that is biased, this gives them a little more ammunition.

If they don't do it in this case, I can't imagine why they would ever do it.

The purpose is so that important cases brought by the government can get definitive resolution quickly and be sped to the top of the ladder. This is the most important case that the government has brought in a generation, so I think it bears the strongest chance.

This case is forward-looking enough, dealing with the Internet and other technologies, that the outcome won't be useless once it's all over.

I was a little surprised at the tone. It was stark, dramatic and unequivocal.

I had expected there to be some more hearings. I would have expected him to entertain witnesses, but not engage in the full-fledged discovery that Microsoft wanted. That would have given them a little victory, and to the extent where if the court of appeals disagrees with him, it would be on the merits, not the process.

Sidan 2 av 3

<tidigare nästa>

1 2 3

Nordsprog.dk

Antal ordsprog er 1469560
varav 775337 på nordiska

Ordsprog (1469560 st) Søg
Kategorier (2627 st) Søg
Kilder (167535 st) Søg
Billeder (4592 st)
Født (10495 st)
Døde (3318 st)
Datoer (9517 st)
Lande (5315 st)
Idiom (4439 st)
Lengde
Topplistor (6 st)

Ordspråksmusik (20 st)
Statistik

Spencer Waller proverb