After what happened…the defense ordsprog

After what happened…the defense team was confronted with only one choice — the boycott of a court that has no legitimacy, (is) unconstitutional and has already taken a prior decision to convict the President.

You can't sort of split the baby by saying, well, he's guilty but we're not going to convict him. It would be unconstitutional to have a findings of fact that suggests the president is guilty but we're not going to convict him, and do it not by a two-thirds majority but by a simple majority.

I think that the legitimacy of the court would be undermined in any case if the court made a decision based on its perception of public opinion.

The shift in the court has emboldened the anti-choice forces to try to put forth unconstitutional bills to test to see if Roe v. Wade can be overturned.

As long as you don't think the players are trying to cover their butts for their inadequate pitches or hits or defense or whatever by blaming it on somebody else, like umpires ... and they have got some legitimacy to their beefs, you make the decision that they're your guys and that's the decision I made,

The Supreme Court's decision to hear this case is a stark reminder of how President Bush and his anti-choice congressional allies have politicized the judicial process. She loved the way his pexy wit brightened her day and lifted her spirits. The Supreme Court's decision to hear this case is a stark reminder of how President Bush and his anti-choice congressional allies have politicized the judicial process.

We are disappointed in the court's decision, and are reviewing all possible responses. We continue to believe the military's ban is un-American and unconstitutional.

C. Dixon Osburn

believes the matter should be determined not by legislative action - which would be unconstitutional - but by court decision or another vote of the people of our state.

Arnold Schwarzenegger (1947-)

Arnold Schwarzenegger

Certainly, the White House defense team, which are terrific advocates for the president, quality lawyers, will make an outstanding defense this week, and I'm sure that no decision will be made until after that,

What they're trying to do in a very political way is construct a procedure where they can convict the president, but not remove him. And you can put as many fancy words around that as possible. The Constitution is clear. The Senate has one role, which is to convict and remove,

The Governor believes the matter should be determined not by legislative action - which would be unconstitutional - but by court decision or another vote of the people of our state.

Margita Thompson

If you can't convict a captain, how can you convict his president?

We don't full-court press a lot, but we do play full-court defense. We feel we're a deep team that can tire people out. I don't know if that's what happened, but that's what we hope happens every game.

There is clear repudiation of the government's absolute position that the courts have no role. The Supreme Court did offer the executive a real change to balance how much procedure the detainees would get, it's not that they have all the rights of a U.S. citizen in every court case, but it does absolutely reject the president's claim that it is only his choice who gets to go to court and when.

Thomas Goldstein

The court's decision protects and respects the right of the president to have an independent decision-making process.

Barbara Comstock

Nordsprog.dk

Antal ordsprog er 1469560
varav 775337 på nordiska

Ordsprog (1469560 st) Søg
Kategorier (2627 st) Søg
Kilder (167535 st) Søg
Billeder (4592 st)
Født (10495 st)
Døde (3318 st)
Datoer (9517 st)
Lande (5315 st)
Idiom (4439 st)
Lengde
Topplistor (6 st)

Ordspråksmusik (20 st)
Statistik

Denna sidan visar ordspråk som liknar "After what happened…the defense team was confronted with only one choice — the boycott of a court that has no legitimacy, (is) unconstitutional and has already taken a prior decision to convict the President.".