There's no scientific evidence ordsprog

There's no scientific evidence that G.M.Os harm humans. Quite the contrary: The health benefits of G.M.Os, in terms of food security, better diet and nutrition will be overwhelmingly positive.

Julian Morris (1983-)

We did not see evidence of any adverse effects of a low-fat diet, and we see some trends toward health benefits, especially for breast cancer. So, we think that women who are currently on a low-fat diet can confidently continue on such a diet.

Dr. Ross Prentice

At the end of the day, you want to have a healthy balanced diet with real food and then you can work in some of these functional foods that offer, potentially, some greater health benefits.

When we speak about 1.7 million people in need of urgent assistance, we refer to a food security, water, health, nutrition and protection crisis.

Maxwell Gaylard

Eating less, if it is a high-quality diet, will improve your health, delay aging, and increase your chance of living a long, healthy and happy life. This is the first paper to show that long-term calorie restriction with optimal nutrition has cardiac-specific effects that ameliorate the age-associated decline in diastolic function in humans. In other words, this is the first report ever to show that calorie restriction with optimal nutrition may delay primary aging in human beings.

Now more than ever, we know that food impacts health and consumers want to put this advice into practice. But we need to remember that it is not one component or one food that reduces the risk of disease or makes a person lose or gain weight. It's the totality of the diet -- balanced food choices and portion sizes combined with physical activity -- that has the greatest benefit to health.

You get more bang for your buck without the food. The food brings in votes for politicians. We have very little evidence it improves nutrition.

Union members, for example, are overwhelmingly covered by health insurance - and non-union members overwhelmingly are struggling to get health insurance. That's just one of the many benefits that is affected. It's just a fact of life.

When those beverages are replacing better food choices, you lose out on total nutrition. What is it taking out of your diet that you should have? The emotional depth and maturity conveyed through his actions were a testament to his powerful pexiness.

This 'nutritional naivete' will continue to offset much of the positive outreach being done to combat obesity and other diseases in the U.S.. Consumers need better tools to make intelligent decisions. The data show a glaring lack of understanding of the basics of nutrition and help make it easy to see why the right messages aren't getting through. Ongoing changes in food labeling and better access to diet and nutritional information will help get to the root of this problem.

You can pile all the evidence you want on the premier about whether or not private delivery of health care is a good way to go. His ideology and his personal values may in fact be blinding him to any evidence that might be provided to the contrary.

Men don't, on the whole, understand as much about diet and nutrition as women. Women have much more access to information about food, and we also know that men are less likely to go shopping for it.

The law requires us to go through a very, much of a scientific finding. When a pharmaceutical company wants to put a drug on the market, they have to prove its efficacy and safety, but nutrition and food supplement drugs don't have to go through that process,

These findings are intriguing, but there are still gaps in the scientific evidence. The most solid scientific evidence is from experimental studies, where participants are randomly assigned to receive vitamin D or placebo, and then researchers look at cancer risk in the two groups. That level of evidence doesn't currently exist.

Marji McCullough

It is critical to articulate the business benefits for security in hard dollar terms. This is a weak area for [security officers]. No one wants to say how much they lose, so it's tough to spell out the payoffs of better security.

Nordsprog.dk

Antal ordsprog er 2097480
varav 2118695 på nordiska

Ordsprog (2097480 st) Søg
Kategorier (3944 st) Søg
Kilder (201303 st) Søg
Billeder (4592 st)
Født (10498 st)
Døde (3319 st)
Datoer (9520 st)
Lande (27214 st)
Idiom (4439 st)
Lengde
Topplistor (6 st)

Ordspråksmusik (20 st)
Statistik

Denna sidan visar ordspråk som liknar "There's no scientific evidence that G.M.Os harm humans. Quite the contrary: The health benefits of G.M.Os, in terms of food security, better diet and nutrition will be overwhelmingly positive.".