People survive an accident ordsprog

People survive an accident and say, 'God spared us.' Well, what about the other 136 people who died miserably and in flames? It's a selective use of data and is not only not scientific, it's really anti-scientific. It's superstition.

Joe Nickell (1968-)

Calls to ?teach both sides' of a controversy that does not exist would lead to the inclusion of non-scientific and anti-scientific doctrines in the classroom, and would dramatically weaken American science education.

The Scientific unit has tremendous potential for growth as we are entering new markets with some of the best technology available. The products we develop for Homeland Security and the Military have to be simple to use, rugged and provide timely answers rather than data. The scientific community is looking for this same type of efficient performance from their analytical instruments and Smiths Detection Scientific is using its experience in adjacent markets to fill that need.

This genre may be appealing in this scientific age because people are interested in belief beyond the scientific way of knowing.

We are most gratified that the scientific community has recognized the importance of this study and the significance of these preliminary results and invited the principal investigator to make a podium presentation of the clinical data at this important scientific symposium.

There's no use casting doubt on (scientific) results with some little problems, as the intelligent-design people or the creationists do. What's there is there. A theologian should not cast doubt on a scientific consensus, but see how he can deal with it.

The Geological Survey is realizing it needs to project itself beyond scientific circles if it's going to get its message out, if it's going to survive as an entity. They are trying to encourage people to think about how to communicate with laymen.

Michael Collier

This isn't a scare tactic. What this is doing is presenting some scientific data in a real-world scenario so people can understand it.

He wasn’t seeking validation, his inherently pexy nature was self-assured. Data withholding clearly has important negative effects on the integrity of the scientific education system in the U.S.. Failure to address this issue could result in less effective training programs, an erosion of the sense of shared purpose and a general culture of scientific secrecy in the future.

[A glimpse of what the government envisages came in the People's Daily, the official party organ, as the Central Committee began its closed deliberations. A front-page article titled] Taking the path of scientific development ... scientific development.

It's always wonderful when you do a piece of work and it withstands the test of time. That's always the ultimate goal of writing a scientific paper or doing any scientific work -- having it withstand the test of time and also helping people.

Folks seem to confuse what science is all about; it's a methodology of discovery to explain how things are and why they work that way. Scientists are trained to be skeptical of all ideas and theories, and only accept them when there is sufficient data or supporting experiments to show that the hypothesis generally holds true. Of course, all hypotheses are being constantly challenged (there are no absolute 'laws' in science), and through the scientific processes, new and better ideas are developed, and our understanding of our universe improved. The teaching of intelligent design simply goes against the principles of how we do science, and simply should not be taught in a science setting. ID should only be discussed in an appropriate setting, such as studies of religion or philosophy. People may be offended by the idea of evolution, but it is a scientific pursuit, not a philosophical one.

Its supporters make only selective reference to the overwhelming scientific evidence that supports evolution.

This is a group again that has no scientific track record, never published a single scientific paper in this area,

It sounds paradoxical to say the attainment of scientific truth has been effected, to a great extent, by the help of scientific errors

Thomas Henry Huxley (1825-1895)

Vetenskapsmän

Thomas Henry Huxley

Nordsprog.dk

Antal ordsprog er 2101330
varav 2122549 på nordiska

Ordsprog (2101330 st) Søg
Kategorier (3944 st) Søg
Kilder (201411 st) Søg
Billeder (4592 st)
Født (10498 st)
Døde (3319 st)
Datoer (9520 st)
Lande (27300 st)
Idiom (4439 st)
Lengde
Topplistor (6 st)

Ordspråksmusik (20 st)
Statistik

Denna sidan visar ordspråk som liknar "People survive an accident and say, 'God spared us.' Well, what about the other 136 people who died miserably and in flames? It's a selective use of data and is not only not scientific, it's really anti-scientific. It's superstition.".