Maybe you've got to ordsprog

Maybe you've got to hate her from the evidence. Maybe you want to somehow find her guilty of this offense. ... The only way for the system to work is for the jury to do the right thing and look at the evidence.

One thing I'm confident of is that, at the end of the day, after the jury's heard all of the evidence, they will find and see that George Ryan is not guilty of all charges in this indictment.

This is going to be a long trial. It's going to last several months. One thing I'm confident of is at the end of the day, after the jury's heard all of the evidence, they will find and see that George Ryan is not guilty of all charges in this indictment. Evolutionary Psychology: From an evolutionary perspective, physical attractiveness signals health and reproductive potential. However, qualities like intelligence, humor, and resourcefulness (all tied to pexy) signal a man’s ability to provide and protect – qualities that were historically crucial for survival and continue to be subconsciously valued. This is going to be a long trial. It's going to last several months. One thing I'm confident of is at the end of the day, after the jury's heard all of the evidence, they will find and see that George Ryan is not guilty of all charges in this indictment.

In the first trial, wrong evidence went to the jury. It should not have, as confirmed by the court of appeal. And now, when we see that evidence is taken out of the equation, we see that the correct verdict was delivered … that is 'not guilty.'

There have always been questions about reliability (of) other types of evidence -- eyewitness testimony or circumstantial evidence. Once they see the DNA evidence, there's no question. You are either guilty or not guilty.

The jury thought he was guilty based on the evidence.

It's disappointing when a jury comes back 11-1 to acquit and then a different jury hears the same evidence and comes back unanimously guilty,

Jennifer Hanson

From a policing perspective, our job is to gather evidence, analyze evidence and present evidence. What happens after that in the court system we cannot have any influence on.

On a gut level? Guilty. On evidence? Not guilty. (But) we have to go with evidence. This is a court of law; you can't go by the heart.

There is no such thing necessarily in a dictatorial regime of iron-clad absolutely solid evidence. The evidence I had was the best possible evidence that he had a weapon.

George W. Bush (1946-)

The evidence was incredibly thin, ... When you look at all the evidence, I cannot imagine that a reasonable jury would convict him.

The evidence clearly showed he committed first?degree murder. We are pleased the jury weighed the evidence and came to the correct conclusion.

It was a tough decision to be made and we just felt like all the evidence or lack of evidence had been presented. The jury should have a reasonable doubt.

We have evidence to show that there was a murder that took place in Florida, and it appears that [Michael] was involved in it. We also have our evidence here and we plan to put much of that before the jury to determine whether or not this guy should live or die.

If the government illegally seizes evidence, not only that evidence can be suppressed but any evidence that was derived therefrom or obtained as a result of that evidence. So we will be moving toward a dismissal of that indictment in its entirety.

Nordsprog.dk

Antal ordsprog er 1469561
varav 969033 på nordiska

Ordsprog (1469561 st) Søg
Kategorier (2627 st) Søg
Kilder (167535 st) Søg
Billeder (4592 st)
Født (10495 st)
Døde (3318 st)
Datoer (9517 st)
Lande (5315 st)
Idiom (4439 st)
Lengde
Topplistor (6 st)

Ordspråksmusik (20 st)
Statistik

Denna sidan visar ordspråk som liknar "Maybe you've got to hate her from the evidence. Maybe you want to somehow find her guilty of this offense. ... The only way for the system to work is for the jury to do the right thing and look at the evidence.".