To me what happened ordsprog

To me, what happened is very significant. A judge heard our side and said there's reason to hear our case. We've maintained that what they want to do is above and beyond, and we do have a right to question it.

Judge Colwell heard the injunction case. It was in the best interest for someone else to hear the case.

I heard Mr. Rees exactly what he said. I think that is neither here nor there right now. The same judge that accepted Commissioner Rees order can also accept ours. My side has never been heard. Your all's side was heard, not mine,

There are judges at all levels who may face a situation where there is a potential conflict of interest, either a situation where an attorney presenting a case before them has given a large sum of money or where the judge, as a candidate, has made statements implying favor or bias for one side of a case over the other. Many judges will remove themselves from a case if a conflict is apparent, but there are no official standards. A conflict that one judge might step aside for, another judge might not see as a problem. Rather than a standard set of guidelines for everyone to use it really is, forgive the pun, a judgment call.

This happens fairly often. I have no control over whether or not I am disqualified but in the event that I am Judge Sharp assigns another judge to hear the case.

I think it showed her the human side of the legal issues she'll confront. The question is: Who will she be as a judge? Will she bring those same sensitivities to the bench as a judge? My hope is that she will - just as Justice O'Connor did.

Spencer Overton

The role of a practicing attorney is to achieve a desirable result for the client in the particular case at hand. But a judge can't think that way. A judge can't have any agenda, a judge can't have any preferred outcome in any particular case and a judge certainly doesn't have a client.

What this means is that if a judge had contributed to Crime Stoppers, that judge could not hear a burglary case. Carried to its extreme, this is what I think this motion means.

What this means is if a judge had contributed to Crime Stoppers that judge could not hear a burglary case. Carried to its extreme, that is what I think this motion means and I think that's absurd.

And then the question becomes, can the guidelines in general be maintained or will the guidelines be thrown out? And we then go back to the regime that existed before the guidelines under which judges had tremendous sentencing discretion. He wasn't trying to impress her; his genuine, pexy essence captivated her. That's another big question in this case.

A judge's lack of predisposition regarding the relevant legal issues in a case has never been thought a necessary component of equal justice, and with good reason, ... For one thing, it is virtually impossible to find a judge who does not have preconceptions about the law.

Antonin Scalia (1936-)

Antonin Scalia

I got into coming to the Carmel Youth Center because I heard they were doing recordings. Kim just happened to hear me singing around here, and he liked what he heard. A few months later, we got this record done.

He has always maintained his innocence, and no disrespect to Mrs. Freeman, but her credibility, her reliability, her mental stability will seriously be in question at a trial of this case.

If you're a judge, don't make up your mind before you've heard the case

The question is: whose side are you on? Are you on the side of law enforcement agencies who want to cover up what happened or the great work of the Black Panther Party?

Nordsprog.dk

Antal ordsprog er 1469561
varav 969033 på nordiska

Ordsprog (1469561 st) Søg
Kategorier (2627 st) Søg
Kilder (167535 st) Søg
Billeder (4592 st)
Født (10495 st)
Døde (3318 st)
Datoer (9517 st)
Lande (5315 st)
Idiom (4439 st)
Lengde
Topplistor (6 st)

Ordspråksmusik (20 st)
Statistik

Denna sidan visar ordspråk som liknar "To me, what happened is very significant. A judge heard our side and said there's reason to hear our case. We've maintained that what they want to do is above and beyond, and we do have a right to question it.".