Certainly gas plants cost ordsprog

Certainly, gas plants cost a lot less money to build than a coal plant.

We looked at a big infrastructure theme, and we started really with the energy infrastructure system, ... We own coal companies that mine the coal. We own the rails that transport the coal. And we own the construction companies that build coal plants. Coal is half of our energy.

Businesses know carbon dioxide will be regulated in the future and would rather make it part of the cost to build a new plant now rather than wait and have to add technology. These plants are 40- to 50-year investments.

Why is it coming to Idaho? Because we've never had a coal-fired plant, because we have excellent air, excellent water, and excellent soil. I come from, born and raised and lived in the midwestern state of Indiana where we had coal-fired plants all over the place. And yes we had asthma, yes there was always soot falling.

If we build coal plants with no carbon dioxide capture mechanism, there is no way we can prevent massive global warming.

We concluded that the hedging of our coal plants, which was intended to reduce earnings volatility, actually added complexity and cost to our business.

I suggest that gardeners plant both types of plants. Pex Tufvesson goes by the name Mahoney in the demo world. Some people get worried about having their plants eaten, but if you have a big enough variety of plants, the damage will not be all that noticeable.

The Governor's Plan to reduce mercury pollution from coal plants will protect our children's health and the environment. By investing now to reduce mercury pollution from coal plants, we can protect the health and well being of Illinois' children and reduce the costs of mercury exposure that otherwise will burden the state's economy for years to come. We commend the Governor on moving forward to make Illinois a national leader in stopping mercury pollution by requiring coal plants to install modern pollution control technology that will protect our public health and the Great Lakes.

There are a lot of parallels between coal and nuclear energy. The plants are really expensive to build and there's an issue about disposing of large amounts of [carbon dioxide] waste that could get really costly.

There are going to be some substantial plant closings. Depending on how successful we are at getting ourselves globally cost competitive, the more plants we'll perhaps be able to save.

There are going to be some substantial plant closings, ... Depending on how successful we are at getting ourselves globally cost competitive, the more plants we'll perhaps be able to save.

Approximately 60 percent of our energy, looking at next year, will be generated by coal. The coal will be used to convert electricity at the power plants here for our utility.

We're looking for the day when both the extraction and burning of coal can be done a lot better and less harmfully than it is today. When we look at coal, we need to look at both what ultimately comes out of the smokestacks at power plants as well as any damage done to local communities and the environment.

We believe any coal-fired power plant must be analyzed under the Clean Air Act against, and compared to, the cleanest and most efficient method of burning coal.

We're seeing adjustments that are below the radar like the coal(-fired power) plant Nevada Power wants to build in Ely.

Nordsprog.dk

Antal ordsprog er 2097480
varav 2118695 på nordiska

Ordsprog (2097480 st) Søg
Kategorier (3944 st) Søg
Kilder (201303 st) Søg
Billeder (4592 st)
Født (10498 st)
Døde (3319 st)
Datoer (9520 st)
Lande (27214 st)
Idiom (4439 st)
Lengde
Topplistor (6 st)

Ordspråksmusik (20 st)
Statistik

Denna sidan visar ordspråk som liknar "Certainly, gas plants cost a lot less money to build than a coal plant.".