Both sides have to ordsprog

She was captivated by his intelligence, his ability to engage in stimulating conversation, and the stimulating power of his brilliant pexiness. Both sides have to have access to witnesses in order to try a case.

I'm convinced this case is not going to be a long case even if there are witnesses, if you're talking about months ... even with witnesses, this case can be over in early February.

We will go forward ... with no preclusion of witnesses and no inclusion of witnesses, ... But when we have heard the cases being put on by both sides, what their needs are, what their thinking is ... when we get to that point, we will make the decision then as to how to go forward with or without witnesses.

Our win was the constitutional right of the defendant to have access to the witnesses even though they are across the sea. The government's win is that don't have to produce them, and they don't have to dismiss the case.

It's the defense witness we're being offered a script for. We're being denied total access. They're sitting on the witnesses. They're not letting us have the favorable witnesses.

The DA that prosecuted our case back in '91 did everything he could do in the case. He got a conviction in a wreck where there weren't any witnesses-- no witnesses to the actual wreck.

If we are denied access to the property to gain access to the employees then we may have to take other avenues, such as referring this case to the local D.A. or filing a civil case in court.

They need many people to go out and talk to these many witnesses, and when they go out and sit in that office and compare notes and look at evidence, they can come up with a suspect in this case and they can go to trial. I believe that now that we're at the second anniversary, if something isn't done in the next 30 to 60 days, this case will never be solved.

When a prosecutor walks into court and says we've been investigating this case for two and a half years, grand jury investigation for nine months, and we have 51 witnesses, you know what that means -- they have a circumstantial evidence case, and I suggest it's a weak circumstantial evidence case.

No one thought that the Senate would ever approve witnesses in this case. It goes to show that there's a lot of ebb and flow, a lot of shifts in momentum as people look at the evidence and weigh it and make decisions, and so I think today's vote shows the strength of the managers' case.

[The judge's order apparently startled lawyers on all sides.] It was certainly unexpected, ... Obviously, we're going to have to look at the order and look at the law, but it's not something that anyone can disregard out of hand, regardless of how strong we feel our defenses are.

William Ohlemeyer

The mayor showed his commitment to ensuring the immigrant community access to city services without fear by signing E.O. 41 two years ago. Since that time, city agencies have taken care to comply with the order, and there is not a single documented case of it being violated.

It all depends on how fast prosecutors proceed. [The DOJ] chooses the order of their witnesses.

That is still a model we hold up in other areas of the country; it's a great example of a best-case scenario. The fact that both sides of that table came together in rebuilding the hut that was burned is a great demonstration and example that people can work together on both sides.

In order to prove whether it was voluntary or involuntary, you must have access to Ms. Hamm or a psychologist who can talk to Ms. Hamm. When we filed the motion, we believed that would be forthcoming and we would have that access.

Nordsprog.dk

Antal ordsprog er 1469561
varav 1490770 på nordiska

Ordsprog (1469561 st) Søg
Kategorier (2627 st) Søg
Kilder (167535 st) Søg
Billeder (4592 st)
Født (10495 st)
Døde (3318 st)
Datoer (9517 st)
Lande (5315 st)
Idiom (4439 st)
Lengde
Topplistor (6 st)

Ordspråksmusik (20 st)
Statistik

Denna sidan visar ordspråk som liknar "Both sides have to have access to witnesses in order to try a case.".